Scanning SQUID Susceptometry of a paramagnetic superconductor
J. R. Kirtley, B. Kalisky, J. A. Bert, C. Bell, Y. Hikita, H. Y. Hwang, J. H. Ngai, Y. Segal, F. J. Walker, C. H. Ahn, K. A. Moler
arXiv:1204.3355 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.224518 · 2012-04-16 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Scanning SQUID susceptometry images the local magnetization and susceptibility of a sample. By accurately modeling the SQUID signal we can determine the physical properties such as the penetration depth and permeability of superconducting samples. We calculate the scanning SQUID susceptometry signal for a superconducting slab of arbitrary thickness with isotropic London penetration depth, on a non-superconducting substrate, where both slab and substrate can have a paramagnetic response that is linear in the applied field. We derive analytical approximations to our general expression in a number of limits. Using our results, we fit experimental susceptibility data as a function of the sample-sensor spacing for three samples: 1) delta-doped SrTiO3, which has a predominantly diamagnetic response, 2) a thin film of LaNiO3, which has a predominantly paramagnetic response, and 3) a two-dimensional electron layer (2-DEL) at a SrTiO3/AlAlO3 interface, which exhibits both types of response. These formulas will allow the determination of the concentrations of paramagnetic spins and superconducting carriers from fits to scanning SQUID susceptibility measurements.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Scanning SQUID susceptometry of a paramagnetic superconductor
similarity 0.91J. R. Kirtley et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner response of superconductors with inhomogeneous penetration depths
similarity 0.89V. G. Kogan & J. R. Kirtley · 2011 · arXiv:1103.4553
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between Superconductivity and Charge Density Waves: the Role of Disorder
similarity 0.88A. Attanasi · 2009 · arXiv:0906.1159
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced SQUID-on-lever scanning probe for high-sensitivity magnetic microscopy with sub-100-nm spatial resolution
similarity 0.87Timur Weber et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2508.01927
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic imaging of Pearl vortices
similarity 0.87F. Tafuri et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0402667
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local imaging of diamagnetism in proximity coupled niobium nano-island arrays on gold thin films
similarity 0.87Logan Bishop-Van Horn et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.09084
Source status unknown — claims are unverified