Superconducting pairing and the pseudogap in nematic striped La2-xSrxCuO4
S. Sugai, Y. Takayanagi, N. Hayamizu, T. Muroi, R. Shiozaki, J. Nohara, K. Takenaka, K. Okazaki
arXiv:1302.6917 · DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/25/47/475701 · 2013-02-26 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The individual k\parallel and k\perp stripe excitations in fluctuating spin-charge stripes have not been observed yet. In Raman scattering if we set, for example, incident and scattered light polarizations to two possible stripe directions, we can observe the fluctuating stripe as if it is static. Using the different symmetry selection rule between the B1g two-magnon scattering and the B1g and B2g isotropic electronic scattering, we succeeded to obtain the k\parallel and k\perp strip magnetic excitations separately in La2-xSrxCuO4. Only the k\perp stripe excitations appear in the wide-energy isotropic electronic Raman scattering, indicating that the charge transfer is restricted to the direction perpendicular to the stripe. This is the same as the Burgers vector of an edge dislocation which easily slides perpendicularly to the stripe. Hence charges at the edge dislocation move together with the dislocation perpendicularly to the stripe, while other charges are localized. A looped edge dislocation has lower energy than a single edge dislocation. The superconducting coherence length is close to the inter-charge stripe distance at x \le 0.2. Therefore we conclude that Cooper pairs are formed at looped edge dislocations. The restricted charge transfer direction naturally explains the opening of a pseudogap around (0, π) for the stripe parallel to the b axis and the reconstruction of the Fermi surface to have a flat plane near (0, π). They break the four-fold rotational symmetry. Furthermore the systematic experiments revealed the carrier density dependence of the isotropic and anisotropic electronic excitations, the spin density wave and/or charge density wave gap near (π/2, π/2), and the strong coupling between the electronic states near (π/2, π/2) and the zone boundary phonons at (π, π).
Similar papers
Two pseudogaps with different energy scales at the antinode of the high-temperature BiSrCuO superconductor using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.92K. Nakayama et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1105.5865
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Monotonic d-wave Superconducting Gap in Optimally-Doped BiSrLaCuO Superconductor by Laser-Based Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
similarity 0.92Jianqiao Meng et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0808.0806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct doping dependences of the pseudogap and superconducting gap of La2−xSrxCuO4 cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91M. Hashimoto et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping Dependent Density of States and Pseudogap Behavior in La2-xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.91A. Ino et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806341
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fractionalized pair density wave in the pseudo-gap phase of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91D. Chakraborty et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1906.01633
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional fully-gapped superconductivity in the heavy-fermion metal CeCuSi
similarity 0.90Michael Smidman et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.01901
Source status unknown — claims are unverified