Theoretical Field Limits for Multi-Layer Superconductors
Sam Posen, Gianluigi Catelani, Matthias U. Liepe, James P. Sethna, Mark K. Transtrum
arXiv:1309.3239 · 2013-09-12 · arXiv: Accelerator Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The SIS structure---a thin superconducting film on a bulk superconductor separated by a thin insulating film---was propsed as a method to protect alternative SRF materials from flux penetration by enhancing the first critical field $B_{c1}$. In this work, we show that in fact $B_{c1}$ = 0 for a SIS structure. We calculate the superheating field $B_{sh}$, and we show that it can be enhanced slightly using the SIS structure, but only for a small range of film thicknesses and only if the film and the bulk are different materials. We also show that using a multilayer instead of a single thick layer is detrimental, as this decreases $B_{sh}$ of the film. We calculate the dissipation due to vortex penetration above the $B_{sh}$ of the film, and find that it is unmanageable for SRF applications. However, we find that if a gradient in the phase of the order parameter is introduced, SIS structures may be able to shield large DC and low frequency fields. We argue that the SIS structure is not beneficial for SRF cavities, but due to recent experiments showing low-surface-resistance performance above $B_{c1}$ in cavities made of superconductors with small coherence lengths, we argue that enhancement of $B_{c1}$ is not necessary, and that bulk films of alternative materials show great promise.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb3Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Shielding superconductors with thin films
similarity 0.88Sam Posen et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1506.08428
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superheating in coated niobium
similarity 0.88T. Junginger et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.06383
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for current suppression in superconductor-superconductor bilayers
similarity 0.87Md Asaduzzaman et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.09360
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multilayer model for coatings with arbitrary layers for superconducting radio-frequency applications
similarity 0.87Aaron Gobeyn et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2605.07958
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Penetration in Magneto-Superconducting Heterostructures
similarity 0.87Serkan Erdin · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404585
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Vortex Lattice in Ginzburg-Landau Superconductors
similarity 0.87Ernst Helmut Brandt · 2008 · arXiv:0806.1058
Source status unknown — claims are unverified