Evidence for current suppression in superconductor-superconductor bilayers
Md Asaduzzaman, Ryan M. L. McFadden, Anne-Marie Valente-Feliciano, David R. Beverstock, Andreas Suter, Zaher Salman, Thomas Prokscha, Tobias Junginger
arXiv:2304.09360 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ad1462 · 2023-04-19 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities, which are critical components in many particle accelerators, need to be operated in the Meissner state to avoid strong dissipation from magnetic vortices. For a defect-free superconductor, the maximum attainable magnetic field for operation is set by the superheating field, $B_{\mathrm{sh}}$, which directly depends on the surface current. In heterostructures composed of different superconductors, the current in each layer depends not only on the properties of the individual material, but also on the electromagnetic response of the adjacent layers through boundary conditions at the interfaces. Three prototypical bilayers [$\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN}$(50 nm)/Nb, $\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN}$(80 nm)/Nb, and $\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN}$(160 nm)/Nb] are investigated here by depth-resolved measurements of their Meissner screening profiles using low-energy muon spin rotation (LE-$μ$SR). From fits to a model based on London theory (with appropriate boundary and continuity conditions), a magnetic penetration depth for the thin $\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN}$ layers of $λ_\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN} =$ 182.5(31) nm is found, in good agreement with literature values for the bulk alloy. Using the measured $λ_\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN}$, the maximum vortex-free field, $B_{\mathrm{max}}$, of the superconductor-superconductor (SS) bilayer structure was estimated to be 610(40) mT. The strong suppression of the surface current in the $\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN}$ layer suggests an optimal thickness of $\sim 1.4 λ_{\mathrm{Nb_{1-x}Ti_xN}} =$ 261(14) nm.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb1-xTixN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Depth-resolved measurements of the Meissner screening profile in surface-treated Nb
similarity 0.89Ryan M. L. McFadden et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.11081
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The magnetic penetration depth influenced by the proximity to the surface
similarity 0.89Yu. S. Barash · 2014 · arXiv:1401.1410
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Discovery of an electronic crystal in a cuprate Mott insulator
similarity 0.89Mingu Kang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.08872
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of vortex penetration, jumpwise instabilities and nonlinear surface resistance of type-II superconductors in strong rf fields
similarity 0.88A. Gurevich & G. Ciovati · 2007 · arXiv:0710.1231
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multilayer model for coatings with arbitrary layers for superconducting radio-frequency applications
similarity 0.88Aaron Gobeyn et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2605.07958
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical estimates of maximum fields in superconducting resonant radio frequency cavities: Stability theory, disorder, and laminates
similarity 0.88Danilo B. Liarte et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.00175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified