Current Sensing Noise Thermometry: A fast practical solution to low temperature measurement
Andrew Casey, Frank Arnold, Lev V. Levitin, Chris P. Lusher, John Saunders, Aya Shibahara, Harriet van der Vliet, Dietmar Drung, Thomas Schurig, Graham Batey, Michael Cuthbert, Anthony Matthews
arXiv:1311.3265 · DOI 10.1007/s10909-014-1147-z · 2013-11-13 · Journal of Low Temperature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We describe the design and performance of a series of fast, precise current sensing noise thermometers. The thermometers have been fabricated with a range of resistances from 1.290 $Ω$ down to 0.2 m$\mathrmΩ$. This results in either a thermometer that has been optimised for speed, taking advantage of the improvements in superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) noise and bandwidth, or a thermometer optimised for ultra-low temperature measurement, minimising the system noise temperature. By using a single temperature calibration point, we show that noise thermometers can be used for accurate measurements over a wide range of temperatures below 4 K. Comparisons with a melting curve thermometer, a calibrated germanium thermometer and a pulsed platinum nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer are presented. For the 1.290 $\mathrmΩ$ resistance we measure a 1 % precision in just 100 ms, and have shown this to be independent of temperature.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.45 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Josephson junctions, superconducting circuits, and qubit for quantum technologies
similarity 0.89Roberta Citro et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.20911
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting quantum interference devices with submicron Nb/HfTi/Nb junctions for investigation of small magnetic particles
similarity 0.87J. Nagel et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1106.1985
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The role of kinetic inductance on the performance of YBCO SQUID magnetometers
similarity 0.86Ruffieux, S. et al. · 2020 · arXiv:1910.03991
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting flux-flow type ultra-low-noise magnetic sensors - An alternative to dc-SQUIDs
similarity 0.86Roberto Monaco et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.5761
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanosecond quantum state detection in a current biased dc SQUID
similarity 0.86J. Claudon et al. · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0702453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
QND measurement of a superconducting qubit in the weakly projective regime
similarity 0.86T. Picot et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1007.0166
Source status unknown — claims are unverified