Comparative measurements of ITER Nb3Sn strands between two laboratories
J. Lu, S. Hill, D. McGuire, K. Dellinger, A. Nijhuis, W. A. J. Wessel, H. J. G. Krooshoop, K. Chan, N. N. Martovestky
arXiv:1701.00446 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2017.2685502 · 2016-12-17 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
ITER Nb3Sn strand quality verification tests require large quantities of precise measurements. Therefore regular cross-checking between testing laboratories is critically important. In this paper, we present results from a cross-checking test of 140 samples between the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, USA and the University of Twente, the Netherlands. The tests comprise measurements at 4.2 K on critical current, RRR and hysteresis loss, while at room temperature the chromium layer thickness, Cu/nonCu ratio, filament twist pitch, and diameter were determined. Our results show very good agreement between the two labs. The reasons for small random discrepancies are discussed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb3Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb3Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Comparison and Analysis of Twist Pitch Length Test Methods for ITER Nb3Sn and NbTi Strands
similarity 0.88Fang Liu et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.1688
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Verification Testing of MQXFA Nb3Sn Wires Procured Under LARP
similarity 0.83Jeremy Levitan et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.07825
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transverse load optimisation in Nb3Sn CICC design; influence of cabling, void fraction and strand stiffness
similarity 0.81A. Nijhuis & Y. Ilyin · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultra-low magnetization and hysteresis loss in APC Nb3Sn superconductors
similarity 0.80X Xu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.09945
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ta, Ti and Hf effects on NbSn high-field performance: temperature-dependent dopant occupancy and failure of Kramer extrapolation
similarity 0.80Chiara Tarantini et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.07548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A general scaling relation for the critical current density in Nb3Sn
similarity 0.79A Godeke et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0608404
Source status unknown — claims are unverified