Enhancement of crossed Andreev reflection in normal-superconductor-normal junction of thin topological insulator
SK Firoz Islam, Paramita Dutta, Arijit Saha
arXiv:1704.04112 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.155429 · 2017-04-13 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We theoretically investigate the subgapped transport phenomena through a normal-superconductor-normal (NSN) junction made up of ultra thin topological insulator with proximity induced superconductivity. The dimensional crossover from three dimensional ($3$D) topological insulator (TI) to thin two-dimensional ($2$D) TI introduces a new degree of freedom, the so-called hybridization or coupling between the two surface states. We explore the role of hybridization in transport properties of the NSN junction, especially how it affects the crossed Andreev reflection (CAR). We observe that a rib-like pattern appears in CAR probability profile while examined as a function of angle of incidence and length of the superconductor. Depending on the incoming and reflection or transmission channel, CAR probability can be maneuvered to be higher than $97\%$ under suitable coupling between the two TI surface states along with appropriate gate voltage and doping concentration in the normal region. Coupling between the two surfaces also induces an additional oscillation envelope in the behavior of the angle averaged conductance, with the variation of the length of the superconductor. The behavior of co-tunneling (CT) probability is also very sensitive to the coupling and other parameters. Finally, we also explore the shot noise cross correlation and show that the behavior of the same can be monotonic or non-monotonic depending on the doping concentration in the normal region. Under suitable circumstances, shot noise cross correlation can change sign from positive to negative or vice versa depending on the relative strength of CT and CAR.
Similar papers
Superconducting electron and hole lenses
similarity 0.92Hosein Cheraghchi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.06892
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable crossed Andreev reflection in a heterostructure consisting of ferromagnets, normal metal and superconductors
similarity 0.92Abhiram Soori · 2022 · arXiv:2203.00505
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of crossed Andreev reflection in a normal-superconductor-normal junction made of thin topological insulator
similarity 0.91SK Firoz Islam et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting electron and hole lenses
similarity 0.91H. Cheraghchi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection in diffusive contacts
similarity 0.91A. Brinkman & A. A. Golubov · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611144
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection revealed by self-consistent Keldysh-Usadel formalism
similarity 0.91Johanne Bratland Tjernshaugen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.18191
Source status unknown — claims are unverified