Sample-based calibration for cryogenic broadband microwave reflectometry measurements
F. Couëdo, L. Bergé, L. Dumoulin, M. Aprili, C. A. Marrache-Kikuchi, J. Gabelli
arXiv:1801.00436 · DOI 10.1063/1.5097897 · 2018-01-01 · AIP Advances
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The characteristic frequencies of a system provide important information on the phenomena that govern its physical properties. In this framework, there has recently been renewed interest in cryogenic microwave characterization for condensed matter systems since it allows to probe energy scales of the order of a few $μ$eV. However, broadband measurements of the absolute value of a sample response in this frequency range are extremely sensitive to its environment and require a careful calibration. In this paper, we present an \textit{in situ} calibration method for cryogenic broadband microwave reflectometry experiments that is both simple to implement and through which the effect of the sample electromagnetic environment can be minimized. The calibration references are here provided by the sample itself, at three reference temperatures where its impedance is assumed or measured, and not by external standards as is usual. We compare the frequency-dependent complex impedance (0.1--2 GHz) of an a-Nb$_{15}$Si$_{85}$ superconducting thin film obtained through this Sample-Based Calibration (SBC) and through an Open-Short-Load Standard Calibration (SC) when working at very low temperature (0.02--4 K) and show that the SBC allows us to obtain the absolute response of the sample. This method brings the calibration planes as close as possible to the sample, so that the environment electrodynamic response does not affect the measurement, provided it is temperature independent. This results in a heightened sensitivity, for a given experimental set--up.
Similar papers
Thermal spectrometer for superconducting circuits
similarity 0.89Christoforus Dimas Satrya et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.13417
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In-situ tunable interaction with an invertible sign between a fluxonium and a post cavity
similarity 0.89Desislava G. Atanasova et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.07612
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Qubit-compatible substrates with superconducting through-silicon vias
similarity 0.89K. Grigoras et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.10425
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Grain size in low loss superconducting Ta thin films on c-axis sapphire
similarity 0.88Sarah Garcia Jones et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.11667
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of interfacial dielectric loss in aluminum-on-silicon superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88Janka Biznárová et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.06797
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for coherent quantum phase-slips across a Josephson junction array
similarity 0.88Manucharyan, Vladimir E. et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1012.1928
Source status unknown — claims are unverified