Two-dome superconductivity in FeS induced by a Lifshitz transition
Makoto Shimizu, Nayuta Takemori, Daniel Guterding, Harald O. Jeschke
arXiv:1806.04036 · 2018-06-11
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Among iron chalcogenide superconductors, FeS can be viewed as a simple, highly compressed relative of FeSe without nematic phase and with weaker electronic correlations. Under pressure, however, the superconductivity of stoichiometric FeS disappears and reappears, forming two domes. We perform electronic structure and spin fluctuation theory calculations for tetragonal FeS in order to analyze the nature of the superconducting order parameter. In the random phase approximation we find a gap function with d-wave symmetry at ambient pressure, in agreement with several reports of a nodal superconducting order parameter in FeS. Our calculations show that, as a function of pressure, the superconducting pairing strength decreases until a Lifshitz transition takes place at 4.6 GPa. As a hole pocket with a large density of states appears at the Lifshitz transition, the gap symmetry is altered to sign-changing s-wave. At the same time the pairing strength is severely enhanced and increases up to a new maximum at 5.5 GPa. Therefore, our calculations naturally explain the occurrence of two superconducting domes in FeS.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 4.6 GPa | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 4.65 GPa | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 5.4 GPa | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 5 GPa | — |
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 22.3 GPa | — |
Similar papers
Two-Dome Superconductivity in FeS Induced by a Lifshitz Transition
similarity 0.94Makoto Shimizu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extended Magnetic Dome Induced by Low Pressures in Superconducting FeSeS
similarity 0.90S. Holenstein et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.07164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiple energy gap features of superconducting FeSe investigated by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.90Eike Venzmer et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1506.01877
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-Based Superconductors: A Decade of Materials, Magnetism, and Mechanisms
similarity 0.89Xingye Lu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.11355
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Uniaxial Compression-Induced Anisotropy and Electronic Dimensionality in the Iron-Based Superconductor FeSe
similarity 0.89Alexy Bertrand et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.01062
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal quasi-degenerate orbital origin of two-dome phases in iron pnictide superconductors
similarity 0.89Da-Yong Liu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.20284
Source status unknown — claims are unverified