Substrate surface engineering for high-quality silicon/aluminum superconducting resonators
C. T. Earnest, J. H. Béjanin, T. G. McConkey, E. A. Peters, A. Korinek, H. Yuan, M. Mariantoni
arXiv:1807.08072 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/aae548 · 2018-07-21 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum bits (qubits) with long coherence times are an important element for the implementation of medium- and large-scale quantum computers. In the case of superconducting planar qubits, understanding and improving qubits' quality can be achieved by studying superconducting planar resonators. In this Paper, we fabricate and characterize coplanar waveguide resonators made from aluminum thin films deposited on silicon substrates. We perform three different substrate treatments prior to aluminum deposition: One chemical treatment based on a hydrofluoric acid clean, one physical treatment consisting of a thermal annealing at 880 degree Celsius in high vacuum, one combined treatment comprising both the chemical and the physical treatments. We first characterize the fabricated samples through cross-sectional tunneling electron microscopy acquiring electron energy loss spectroscopy maps of the samples' cross sections. These measurements show that both the chemical and the physical treatments almost entirely remove native silicon oxide from the substrate surface and that their combination results in the cleanest interface. We then study the quality of the resonators by means of microwave measurements in the "quantum regime", i.e., at a temperature T~10 mK and at a mean microwave photon number $\langle n_{\textrm{ph}} \rangle \sim 1$. In this regime, we find that both surface treatments independently improve the resonator's intrinsic quality factor and that the highest quality factor is obtained for the combined treatment, $Q_{\textrm{i}} \sim 0.8$ million. Finally, we find that the TLS quality factor averaged over a time period of 3 h is $\sim 3$ million at $\langle n_{\textrm{ph}} \rangle \sim 10$, indicating that substrate surface engineering can potentially reduce the TLS loss below other losses such as quasiparticle and vortex loss.
Similar papers
Phononic loss in superconducting resonators on piezoelectric substrates
similarity 0.90Marco Scigliuzzo et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.09119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Etching Methods on Dielectric Losses in Transmons
similarity 0.90T. A. Chudakova et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.16097
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
UCSB final report for the CSQ program: Review of decoherence and materials physics for superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89John M. Martinis & A. Megrant · 2014 · arXiv:1410.5793
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of loss in superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators
similarity 0.89Jeremy M. Sage et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.6063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave dielectric losses at millikelvin temperatures of substrates suitable for High critical Temperature Superconductors epitaxial growth
similarity 0.89Marco Arzeo et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1403.2078
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Localization and Mitigation of Loss in Niobium Superconducting Circuits
similarity 0.88M. Virginia P. Altoé et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified