Increases of a Diamagnetic Property by Flux-Pinning in Volume Defect-Dominating Superconductors
H. B. Lee, G. C. Kim, Y. C. Kim, R. K. Ko, D. Y. Jeong
arXiv:1904.06434 · 2019-04-12 · arXiv: Applied Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Whereas there are two critical fields that are H$_{c1}$ and H$_{c2}$ in the ideal type II superconductor, there is another critical field H$_{c1}'$ defined as the field showing the maximum diamagnetic property in the real type II superconductor. We would present that H$_{c1}'$ is able to be proved theoretically and experimentally. We have derived an equation based on flux-pinning effect of volume defects. MgB$_2$ bulks which were synthesized by Mg and B are similar to this model. The number of quantum fluxes pinned at a defect of radius r, a pinning penetration depth, magnetic flux penetration method, and a magnetization at H$_{c1}'$ in the static state are suggested through the equation of the model. It was speculated that pinned fluxes at a volume defect in the superconductor have to be pick-out depinned from the defect and move an inside of the superconductor when pick-out forces of pinned fluxes is larger than pinning force of the defect (F$_{pickout}$ $>$ F$_{pinning}$) or when the shortest distance between pinned fluxes at a volume defect is the same as that of H$_{c2}$. In reality, $Δ$G$_{dynamic}$ which is sum of fluxes movement energy and fluxes vibration energy is involved in movement of pinned fluxes. When volume defects are small and many, the number of pinned fluxes at a volume defect calculated by experimental results was closer to that of ideally calculated ones because of a small $Δ$G$_{dynamic}$. However, when volume defects are large and a few, the number of pinned fluxes at a volume defect calculated by experimental results were much fewer than that of ideally calculated ones because of a large $Δ$G$_{dynamic}$.
Similar papers
Flux-Pinning Behaviors and Mechanism According to Dopant Level in (Fe, Ti) Paticle-Doped MgB Superconductor
similarity 0.90H. B. Lee et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.11146
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Delta H = Delta B region in volume defect-dominating superconductor
similarity 0.90H. B. Lee et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.04683
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Bit Behavior of Pinned Fluxes on Volume Defects in a Superconductor
similarity 0.90H. B. Lee et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.06016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Water-Quenched Effects of 5 wt.% (Fe, Ti) particle-doped MgB Superconductor and Low Limit of Pinning Effect
similarity 0.89H. B. Lee et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1906.05943
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Properties of superconducting MgB_2 wires: "in-situ" versus "ex-situ" reaction technique
similarity 0.89Alexey V Pan et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0302249
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity, critical current density, and flux pinning in MgB_{2-x}(SiC)_{x/2} superconductor after SiC nanoparticle doping
similarity 0.88S. X. Dou et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0207093
Source status unknown — claims are unverified