Quantum Bit Behavior of Pinned Fluxes on Volume Defects in a Superconductor
H. B. Lee, G. C. Kim, Byeong-Joo Kim, Young Jin Sohn, Y. C. Kim
arXiv:2201.06016 · DOI 10.1007/s00339-025-08506-x · 2022-01-16 · Applied Physics A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We studied a qubit based on flux-pinning effects in $Δ$H=$Δ$B region of a superconductor. When volume defects are many enough in a superconductor, $Δ$H=$Δ$B region on M-H curve is formed, which is the region that increased applied magnetic field ($Δ$H) is the same as increasing magnetic induction ($Δ$B). Magnetization (M) is constant in the region by 4$π$M = B - H. Here we show that the behavior of fluxes in $Δ$H=$Δ$B region can be a candidate of qubit. Pinned fluxes on volume defects would move as a bundle in the region by repeating flux-pinning and pick-out depinning process from the surface to the center of the superconductor. During the process, magnetic fluxes would exist as one of states that are flux-pinning state at volume defects and pick-out depinning state in which fluxes are moving in the superconductor. A difference of diamagnetic property occurs between pinning state at volume defects and depinning state from the volume defects. Thus, diamagnetic properties of the superconductor would oscillate in $Δ$H=$Δ$B region and the behavior would be observed in M-H curve. The oscillation can be used for qubit by setting the pinning state at volume defects as $\ket{1}$ and the depinned state as $\ket{0}$. This method can operate at higher temperatures than that of using Josephson Junctions. In addition, it is expected that the device is quite simple and decoherences can be almost negligible.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Delta H = Delta B region in volume defect-dominating superconductor
similarity 0.89H. B. Lee et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.04683
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Increases of a Diamagnetic Property by Flux-Pinning in Volume Defect-Dominating Superconductors
similarity 0.89H. B. Lee et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.06434
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-Pinning Behaviors and Mechanism According to Dopant Level in (Fe, Ti) Paticle-Doped MgB Superconductor
similarity 0.89H. B. Lee et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.11146
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
An Overview of the Basic Physical Properties of MgB
similarity 0.87P. C. Canfield et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0212445
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Water-Quenched Effects of 5 wt.% (Fe, Ti) particle-doped MgB Superconductor and Low Limit of Pinning Effect
similarity 0.87H. B. Lee et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1906.05943
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Quantum Interference Device based on MgB2 nanobridges
similarity 0.87A. Brinkman et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified