Electric field spectroscopy of material defects in transmon qubits
Jürgen Lisenfeld, Alexander Bilmes, Anthony Megrant, Rami Barends, Julian Kelly, Paul Klimov, Georg Weiss, John M. Martinis, Alexey V. Ustinov
arXiv:1909.09749 · DOI 10.1038/s41534-019-0224-1 · 2019-09-21 · npj Quantum Information
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting integrated circuits have demonstrated a tremendous potential to realize integrated quantum computing processors. However, the downside of the solid-state approach is that superconducting qubits suffer strongly from energy dissipation and environmental fluctuations caused by atomic-scale defects in device materials. Further progress towards upscaled quantum processors will require improvements in device fabrication techniques which need to be guided by novel analysis methods to understand and prevent mechanisms of defect formation. Here, we present a new technique to analyse individual defects in superconducting qubits by tuning them with applied electric fields. This provides a new spectroscopy method to extract the defects' energy distribution, electric dipole moments, and coherence times. Moreover, it enables one to distinguish defects residing in Josephson junction tunnel barriers from those at circuit interfaces. We find that defects at circuit interfaces are responsible for about 60% of the dielectric loss in the investigated transmon qubit sample. About 40% of all detected defects are contained in the tunnel barriers of the large-area parasitic Josephson junctions that occur collaterally in shadow evaporation, and only about 3% are identified as strongly coupled defects which presumably reside in the small-area qubit tunnel junctions. The demonstrated technique provides a valuable tool to assess the decoherence sources related to circuit interfaces and to tunnel junctions that is readily applicable to standard qubit samples.
Similar papers
Identification of Different Types of High-Frequency Defects in Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.90Leonid V. Abdurakhimov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Investigation of Parasitic Two-Level Systems in Merged-Element Transmon Qubits
similarity 0.90Etienne Daum et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.22593
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interacting Defects Generate Stochastic Fluctuations in Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.90J. H. Béjanin et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.15748
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
One- and two-photon spectroscopy of a flux qubit coupled to a microscopic defect
similarity 0.89A. Lupascu et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.0590
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Readout failures in superconducting qubits due to TLS-defects in tunnel junctions
similarity 0.89J. Lisenfeld et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2605.02755
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of frequency collisions in superconducting quantum processors
similarity 0.88Amr Osman et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.04663
Source status unknown — claims are unverified