Quantum effects in graphitic materials: Colossal magnetoresistance, Andreev reflections, Little-Parks effect, ferromagnetism, and granular superconductivity
Nadina Gheorghiu, Charles R. Ebbing, Benjamin T. Pierce, Timothy J. Haugan
arXiv:1909.12145 · DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/756/1/012022 · 2019-09-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Unlike the more common local conductance spectroscopy, nonlocal conductance can differentiate between nontopological zero-energy modes localized around inhomogeneities, and true Majorana edge modes in the topological phase. In particular, negative nonlocal conductance is dominated by the crossed Andreev reflection. In graphene, the Andreev reflection and the inter-band Klein tunneling couple electron-like and hole-like states through the action of either a superconducting (SC) pair potential or an electrostatic potential. We are here probing quantum phenomena in modified graphitic samples. Four-point contact transport measurements at cryogenic to room temperatures were conducted using a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System. The observed negative nonlocal differential conductance Gdiff probes the Andreev reflection at the walls of the SC grains coupled by Josephson effect through the semiconducting matrix. In addition, Gdiff shows the butterfly shape that is characteristic to resistive random-access memory devices. In a magnetic field, the Andreev reflection counters the effect of the otherwise lowered conduction. At low temperatures, the magnetoresistance shows irreversible yet strong colossal oscillations that are known to be quantum in nature. In addition, we have found evidence for seemingly granular SC as well as ferromagnetism. Moreover, the Little-Parks effect is revealed in both the classical small-amplitude and the phase-slip driven large-amplitude oscillations in the magnetoresistance. Thus, graphitic materials show potential for quantum electronics applications, including rectification and topological states.
Similar papers
Light-modulated Andreev effects in graphene-based superconducting junctions
similarity 0.87Miao Yu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detection of Valley Polarization in Graphene by a Superconducting Contact
similarity 0.87A. R. Akhmerov & C. W. J. Beenakker
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev conductance in the d+id′-wave superconducting states of graphene
similarity 0.87Yongjin Jiang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev processes in mesoscopic multiterminal graphene Josephson junctions
similarity 0.86Fan Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced specular Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
similarity 0.85Abhiram Soori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev and normal reflections in gapped bilayer graphene–superconductor junctions
similarity 0.85Panch Ram et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified