Nonadiabatic superconductivity in Li-intercalated hexagonal boron nitride bilayer
K. A. Szewczyk, I. A. Domagalska, A. P. Durajski, R. Szczęśniak
arXiv:2001.08732 · DOI 10.3762/bjnano.11.102 · 2020-01-23 · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In the case of Li-intercalated hexagonal boron nitride bilayer (Li-hBN), the vertex corrections of electron-phonon interaction cannot be omitted. This is evidenced by the very high value of the ratio $λω_{D}/\varepsilon_{F}\sim 0.46$, where $λ$ is the electron-phonon coupling constant, $ω_{D}$ is the Debye frequency, and the symbol $\varepsilon_{F}$ represents the Fermi energy. Due to the nonadiabatic effects, the phonon-induced superconducting state in Li-hBN is characterized by the much lower value of critical temperature ($T^{\rm LOVC}_{C}\in\{ 19.1, 15.5, 11.8\}$ K, for $μ^{\star}\in \{0.1, 0.14, 0.2\}$), than would result from calculations not taking this effect into account: $T^{\rm ME}_{C}\in\{ 31.9, 26.9, 21\}$ K. From the technological point of view, the low value of $T_{C}$ limits the possible applications of Li-hBN superconducting properties. The calculations were carried out under the classic Migdal-Eliashberg formalism (ME) and the Eliashberg theory with the lowest-order vertex corrections (LOVC).
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 21 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 21.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiBN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CaC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiNaP Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiP Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiMoS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Room Temperature Superconductivity: the Roles of Theory and Materials Design
similarity 0.91Warren E. Pickett · 2022 · arXiv:2204.05930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Considerations on the Mechanisms and Transition Temperatures of Superconductors
similarity 0.90Varma, C. M. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.3618
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity of RbC: breakdown of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory
similarity 0.90E. Cappelluti et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104457
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Poor screening and nonadiabatic superconductivity in correlated systems
similarity 0.90L. Boeri et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311281
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible superconductivity in very thin magnesium films
similarity 0.90Giovanni Alberto Ummarino & Alessio Zaccone · 2025 · arXiv:2503.05184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Migdal-Eliashberg theory as a classical spin chain
similarity 0.89Emil A. Yuzbashyan & Boris L. Altshuler · 2022 · arXiv:2205.06442
Source status unknown — claims are unverified