Tuning stoichiometry and its impact on superconductivity of monolayer and multilayer FeSe on SrTiO3
Chong Liu, Ke Zou
arXiv:2002.06314 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.140502 · 2020-02-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Synthesis of monolayer FeSe on SrTiO3, with greatly enhanced superconductivity compared to bulk FeSe, remains difficult. Lengthy annealing within a certain temperature window is always required to achieve superconducting samples as reported by different groups around the world, but the mechanism of annealing in inducing superconductivity has not been elucidated. We grow FeSe films on SrTiO3 by molecular beam epitaxy and adjust the stoichiometry by depositing additional small amounts of Fe atoms. The monolayer films become superconducting after the Fe deposition without any annealing, and show similar superconducting transition temperatures as those of the annealed films in transport measurements. We also demonstrate on the 5-unit-cell films that the FeSe multilayer can be reversibly tuned between the non-superconducting $\sqrt{5} \times \sqrt{5}$ phase with Fe-vacancies and superconducting $1 \times 1$ phase. Our results reveal that the traditional anneal process in essence removes Fe vacancies and the additional Fe deposition serves as a more efficient way to achieve superconductivity. This work highlights the significance of stoichiometry in the superconductivity of FeSe thin films and provides an easy path for superconducting samples.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Tuning stoichiometry and its impact on superconductivity of monolayer and multilayer FeSe on SrTiO3
similarity 1.00Chong Liu & Ke Zou
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stoichiometry and defect superstructures in epitaxial FeSe films on SrTiO3
similarity 0.95Xue-Qing Yu et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.09823
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Post-growth Fe deposition on the superconductivity of monolayer FeSe films on SrTiO3−δ
similarity 0.94Xiaotong Jiao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identification of a Large Amount of Excess Fe in Superconducting Single-Layer FeSe/SrTiO3 Films
similarity 0.92Yong Hu et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.04670
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Superconductivity in Multilayer FeSe Films by Simplified Molecular Beam Epitaxy
similarity 0.92Maria Hilse et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2608.24710
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stoichiometric FeTe is a Superconductor
similarity 0.91Zi-Jie Yan et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2603.16115
Source status unknown — claims are unverified