Stoichiometric FeTe is a Superconductor
Zi-Jie Yan, Zihao Wang, Bing Xia, Stephen Paolini, Ying-Ting Chan, Nikalabh Dihingia, Hongtao Rong, Pu Xiao, Kalana D. Halanayake, Jiatao Song, Veer Gowda, Danielle Reifsnyder Hickey, Weida Wu, Jiabin Yu, Peter J. Hirschfeld, Cui-Zu Chang
arXiv:2603.16115 · DOI 10.1038/s41586-026-10321-0 · 2026-03-17 · Nature
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Iron-based superconductors are a fascinating family of materials in which multiple electronic bands and strong antiferromagnetic (AFM) correlations are key ingredients for competing ground states, including antiferromagnetism, electronic nematicity, and unconventional superconductivity. FeTe, unlike its superconducting isostructural counterpart FeSe, has long been regarded as an AFM metal sans superconductivity. In this work, we employ molecular beam epitaxy to grow FeTe films and perform post-growth annealing under a Te flux. By performing spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy, we demonstrate that the AFM order in as-grown FeTe films is induced by interstitial Fe atoms that disrupt the ideal 1:1 stoichiometry. Remarkably, the removal of these interstitial Fe atoms through Te annealing yields stoichiometric FeTe films that show no AFM order and instead exhibit robust superconductivity with a critical temperature of ~13.5K. This superconducting state is further confirmed by the observation of Cooper pair tunneling, zero electrical resistance, and the Meissner effect. Therefore, our results demonstrate that stoichiometric FeTe is inherently a superconductor, overturning a long-held view that it is an AFM metal. This work clarifies the origin of superconductivity in FeTe-based heterostructures and demonstrates the importance of stoichiometry control in understanding the competition between AFM and superconductivity in iron-based superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeTe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeTe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| FeTe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in Fe1.05Te:Ox single crystals
similarity 0.89Z. T. Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Post-growth Fe deposition on the superconductivity of monolayer FeSe films on SrTiO3−δ
similarity 0.89Xiaotong Jiao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct observation of high temperature superconductivity in one-unit-cell FeSe films
similarity 0.88Wenhao Zhang et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.5370
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interlayer coupling of magnetism and electronic structure in two-dimensional superconducting systems: fcc Fe on monolayer FeSe
similarity 0.88Zhao-Feng Ye et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
FeTe as a candidate material for new iron-based superconductor
similarity 0.88Y. Mizuguchi et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.5191
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of Superconductivity Linked with Linear-in-Temperature/Field Resistivity in Ion-Gated FeSe Films
similarity 0.87Xingyu Jiang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.06512
Source status unknown — claims are unverified