NMR shift and relaxation and the electronic spin of superconducting cuprates
Marija Avramovska, Danica Pavićević, Jürgen Haase
arXiv:2002.09903 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-020-05498-y · 2020-02-23 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Very recently, there has been significant progress with establishing a common phenomenology of the superconducting cuprates in terms of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) shift and relaxation. Different from the old interpretation, it was shown that the shifts demand two coupled spin components with different temperature dependencies. One spin component couples isotropically to the planar Cu nucleus and is likely to reside at planar O, while the other, anisotropic component has its origin in the planar copper $3d(x^2-y^2)$ orbital. Nuclear relaxation, on the other hand, was found to be rather ubiquitous and Fermi liquid-like for planar Cu, i.e., it is independent of doping and material, apart from the sudden drop at the superconducting transition temperature, $T_{\rm c}$. However, there is a doping and material dependent anisotropy that is independent on temperature, above and below $T_{\rm c}$. Here we present a slightly different analysis of the shifts that fits all planar Cu shift data. In addition we are able to derive a simple model that explains nuclear relaxation based on these two spin components. In particular, the only outlier so far, \lsco, can be understood, as well. While this concerns predominantly planar Cu, it is argued that the two component model should fit all cuprate shift and relaxation data.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Temperature independent cuprate pseudogap from planar oxygen NMR
similarity 0.91Jakob Nachtigal et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2009.09492
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Properties of the electronic fluid of superconducting cuprates from Cu NMR shift and relaxation
similarity 0.91Marija Avramovska et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.03644
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional O and Cu NMR shift components in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Danica Pavićević et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.13079
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and Condensation in Cuprate Superconductors from NMR Shifts
similarity 0.91Abigail Lee & Juergen Haase · 2026 · arXiv:2604.19215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NMR and neutron-scattering experiments on the cuprate superconductors: A critical re-examination
similarity 0.90Y. Zha et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Contrasting Phenomenology of NMR Shifts in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.90Jürgen Haase et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.04366
Source status unknown — claims are unverified