Properties of the electronic fluid of superconducting cuprates from $^{63}$Cu NMR shift and relaxation
Marija Avramovska, Danica Pavićević, Jürgen Haase
arXiv:1806.03644 · 2018-06-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) provides local, bulk information about the electronic properties of materials, and it has been influential for theory of high-temperature superconducting cuprates. Importantly, NMR found early that nuclear relaxation is much faster than what one expects from coupling to fermionic excitations above the critical temperature for superconductivity ($T_{\rm c}$), i.e. what one estimates from the Knight shift with the Korringa law. As a consequence, special electronic spin fluctuations have been invoked. Here, based on literature relaxation data it is shown that the electronic excitations, to which the nuclei couple with a material and doping dependent anisotropy, are rather ubiquitous and Fermi liquid-like. A suppressed NMR spin shift rather than an enhanced relaxation leads to the failure of the Korringa law for most materials. Shift and relaxation below $T_{\rm c}$ support the view of suppressed shifts, as well. A simple model of two coupled electronic spin components, one with $3d(x^2-y^2)$ orbital symmetry and the other with an isotropic $s$-like interaction can explain the data. The coupling between the two components is found to be negative, and it must be related to the pseudogap behavior of the cuprates. We can also explain the negative shift conundrum and the long-standing orbital shift discrepancy for NMR in the cuprates.
Similar papers
NMR shift and relaxation and the electronic spin of superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.91Marija Avramovska et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.09903
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagram of hole-doped cuprates based on O and Cu NMR quadrupole splittings
similarity 0.91Damian Rybicki et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1402.4014
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenology of Cu nuclear relaxation in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Michael Jurkutat et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.10625
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Carrier concentration independent antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations in the electron-doped high-temperature superconducting cuprate Pr2−xCexCuO4
similarity 0.90G. V. M. Williams et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and Condensation in Cuprate Superconductors from NMR Shifts
similarity 0.90Abigail Lee & Juergen Haase · 2026 · arXiv:2604.19215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Contrasting Phenomenology of NMR Shifts in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.90Jürgen Haase et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.04366
Source status unknown — claims are unverified