← Back to search

Phenomenology of $^{63}$Cu nuclear relaxation in cuprate superconductors

Michael Jurkutat, Marija Avramovska, Grant V. M. Williams, Daniel Dernbach, Danica Pavićević, Jürgen Haase

arXiv:1902.10625 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-019-05275-6 · 2019-02-27 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism

T39 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Nuclear relaxation is an important thermodynamic probe of electronic excitations, in particular in conducting and superconducting systems. Here, an empirical phenomenology based on all available literature data for planar Cu in hole-doped cuprates is developed. It is found that most of the seemingly different relaxation rates among the systems are due to a temperature independent anisotropy that affects the mostly measured $1/T_{1\parallel}$, the rate with an external magnetic field along the crystal $c$-axis, while $1/T_{1\perp}$ is largely independent on doping and material above the critical temperature of superconductivity ($T_c$). This includes very strongly overdoped systems that show Fermi liquid behavior and obey the Korringa law. Below $T_c$ the relaxation rates are similar, as well, if plotted against the reduced temperature $T/T_c$. Thus, planar Cu nuclear relaxation is governed by a simple, dominant mechanism that couples the nuclei with varying anisotropy to a rather ubiquitous bath of electronic excitations that appear Fermi liquid-like irrespective of doping and family. In particular, there is no significant enhancement of the relaxation due to electronic spin fluctuations, different from earlier conclusions. Only the La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ family appears to be an outlier as additional relaxation is present, however, the anisotropy remains temperature independent. Also systems with very low doping levels, for which there is a lack of data, may behave differently.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Tl2Ba2CuO6+y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6+y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

40Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6+y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

72Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers