Phenomenology of $^{63}$Cu nuclear relaxation in cuprate superconductors
Michael Jurkutat, Marija Avramovska, Grant V. M. Williams, Daniel Dernbach, Danica Pavićević, Jürgen Haase
arXiv:1902.10625 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-019-05275-6 · 2019-02-27 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nuclear relaxation is an important thermodynamic probe of electronic excitations, in particular in conducting and superconducting systems. Here, an empirical phenomenology based on all available literature data for planar Cu in hole-doped cuprates is developed. It is found that most of the seemingly different relaxation rates among the systems are due to a temperature independent anisotropy that affects the mostly measured $1/T_{1\parallel}$, the rate with an external magnetic field along the crystal $c$-axis, while $1/T_{1\perp}$ is largely independent on doping and material above the critical temperature of superconductivity ($T_c$). This includes very strongly overdoped systems that show Fermi liquid behavior and obey the Korringa law. Below $T_c$ the relaxation rates are similar, as well, if plotted against the reduced temperature $T/T_c$. Thus, planar Cu nuclear relaxation is governed by a simple, dominant mechanism that couples the nuclei with varying anisotropy to a rather ubiquitous bath of electronic excitations that appear Fermi liquid-like irrespective of doping and family. In particular, there is no significant enhancement of the relaxation due to electronic spin fluctuations, different from earlier conclusions. Only the La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ family appears to be an outlier as additional relaxation is present, however, the anisotropy remains temperature independent. Also systems with very low doping levels, for which there is a lack of data, may behave differently.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tl2Ba2CuO6+y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2CuO6+y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2CuO6+y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 72 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Observation of slow order parameter fluctuations in superconducting films using beta-detected NMR
similarity 0.91E. Morenzoni et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.4508
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Properties of the electronic fluid of superconducting cuprates from Cu NMR shift and relaxation
similarity 0.90Marija Avramovska et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.03644
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Planar Cu and O NMR and the Pseudogap of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.90Marija Avramovska et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.07854
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature independent pseudogap from O and Y NMR and the single component picture
similarity 0.90Marija Avramovska et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.10595
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cu NMR study of a Pb-doped Bi:2201 single crystal
similarity 0.89O. N. Bychina et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.02813
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NMR shift and relaxation and the electronic spin of superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.89Marija Avramovska et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.09903
Source status unknown — claims are unverified