Comment on "Surface Pair-Density-Wave Superconducting and Superfluid States"
Anton B. Vorontsov
arXiv:2007.13696 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.179602 · 2020-07-27
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The claim in Barkman et al [Physical Review Letters {\bf 122}, 165302 (2019)] that pair-density wave (PDW) superconductivity in magnetic field is more stable near surface than in bulk, is not supported by microscopic theory.
Similar papers
Comment on “Ferromagnetic film on a superconducting substrate”
similarity 0.85E. B. Sonin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
p-wave triggered superconductivity in single layer graphene on an electron-doped oxide superconductor
similarity 0.84Angelo Di Bernardo et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.01572
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to Comment on the paper "Pairing mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity: Experimental constraints (arXiv:1012.2368)"
similarity 0.84Guo-meng Zhao · 2011 · arXiv:1101.2694
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ‘‘Zeeman effect on magnetoresistance in high-temperature superconductors’’
similarity 0.84R. S. Thompson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to "Comment on 'Apical charge flux-modulated in-plane transport properties of cuprate superconductors'"
similarity 0.83Xin Li et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.03992
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ‘‘Quantum limit of a flux lattice: Superconductivity and magnetic field in a new relationship’’
similarity 0.83K. Scharnberg & C. T. Rieck
Source status unknown — claims are unverified