Simplified Josephson-junction fabrication process for reproducibly high-performance superconducting qubits
A. Osman, J. Simon, A. Bengtsson, S. Kosen, P. Krantz, D. Perez, M. Scigliuzzo, Jonas Bylander, A. Fadavi Roudsari
arXiv:2011.05230 · DOI 10.1063/5.0037093 · 2020-11-10 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We introduce a simplified fabrication technique for Josephson junctions and demonstrate superconducting Xmon qubits with $T_1$ relaxation times averaging above 50$~μ$s ($Q>$1.5$\times$ 10$^6$). Current shadow-evaporation techniques for aluminum-based Josephson junctions require a separate lithography step to deposit a patch that makes a galvanic, superconducting connection between the junction electrodes and the circuit wiring layer. The patch connection eliminates parasitic junctions, which otherwise contribute significantly to dielectric loss. In our patch-integrated cross-type (PICT) junction technique, we use one lithography step and one vacuum cycle to evaporate both the junction electrodes and the patch. In a study of more than 3600 junctions, we show an average resistance variation of 3.7$\%$ on a wafer that contains forty 0.5$\times$0.5-cm$^2$ chips, with junction areas ranging between 0.01 and 0.16 $μ$m$^2$. The average on-chip spread in resistance is 2.7$\%$, with 20 chips varying between 1.4 and 2$\%$. For the junction sizes used for transmon qubits, we deduce a wafer-level transition-frequency variation of 1.7-2.5$\%$. We show that 60-70$\%$ of this variation is attributed to junction-area fluctuations, while the rest is caused by tunnel-junction inhomogeneity. Such high frequency predictability is a requirement for scaling-up the number of qubits in a quantum computer.
Similar papers
Fabrication of low-loss Josephson parametric devices
similarity 0.90K. E. Honasoge et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Improving Josephson junction reproducibility for superconducting quantum circuits: junction area fluctuation
similarity 0.89A. A. Pishchimova et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.15293
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of frequency collisions in superconducting quantum processors
similarity 0.88Amr Osman et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.04663
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cavity-QED of a quantum metamaterial with tunable disorder
similarity 0.88Grigoriy S. Mazhorin et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.01420
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Density Fabrication Process for Single Flux Quantum Circuits
similarity 0.88D. Yohannes et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.07607
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct Josephson coupling between superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.88M. Grajcar et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0501085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified