The relationship between transport anisotropy and nematicity in FeSe
Jack Bartlett, Alexander Steppke, Suguru Hosoi, Hilary Noad, Joonbum Park, Carsten Timm, Takasada Shibauchi, Andrew P. Mackenzie, Clifford W. Hicks
arXiv:2102.09212 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021038 · 2021-02-18
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The mechanism behind the nematicity of FeSe is not known. Through elastoresitivity measurements it has been shown to be an electronic instability. However, so far measurements have extended only to small strains, where the response is linear. Here, we apply large elastic strains to FeSe, and perform two types of measurements. (1) Using applied strain to control twinning, the nematic resistive anisotropy at temperatures below the nematic transition temperature Ts is determined. (2) Resistive anisotropy is measured as nematicity is induced through applied strain at fixed temperature above Ts. In both cases, as nematicity strengthens the resistive anisotropy peaks about about 7%, then decreases. Below ~40 K, the nematic resistive anisotropy changes sign. We discuss possible implications of this behaviour for theories of nematicity. We report in addition: (1) Under experimentally accessible conditions with bulk crystals, stress, rather than strain, is the conjugate field to the nematicity of FeSe. (2) At low temperatures the twin boundary resistance is ~10% of the sample resistance, and must be properly subtracted to extract intrinsic resistivities. (3) Biaxial inplane compression increases both in-plane resistivity and the superconducting critical temperature Tc, consistent with a strong role of the yz orbital in the electronic correlations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pure nematic quantum critical point accompanied by a superconducting dome
similarity 0.91K. Ishida et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.11674
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematic quantum disordered state in FeSe
similarity 0.90Ruixian Liu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.05092
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Role of nematicity in controlling spin fluctuations and superconducting Tc in bulk FeSe
similarity 0.89Swagata Acharya et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.07729
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spontaneous orbital polarization in the nematic phase of FeSe
similarity 0.89Connor A. Occhialini et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.10377
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The drastic effect of the impurity scattering on the electronic and superconducting properties of Cu-doped FeSe
similarity 0.89Z. Zajicek et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.04624
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of nematicity by tensile strain in multilayer FeSe/SrTiO films
similarity 0.89Rui Lou et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.14416
Source status unknown — claims are unverified