← Back to search

High $J_{\rm c}$ and low anisotropy of hydrogen doped NdFeAsO superconducting thin film

Kazumasa Iida, Jens Hänisch, Keisuke Kondo, Mingyu Chen, Takafumi Hatano, Chao Wang, Hikaru Saito, Satoshi Hata, Hiroshi Ikuta

arXiv:2102.13543 · 2021-02-26

T2theoretical

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The recent realisations of hydrogen doped $Ln$FeAsO ($Ln$=Nd and Sm) superconducting epitaxial thin films call for further investigation of their structural and electrical transport properties. Here, we report on the microstructure of a NdFeAs(O,H) epitaxial thin film and its temperature, field, and orientation dependencies of the resistivity and the critical current density $J_{\rm c}$. The superconducting transition temperature $T_{\rm c}$ is comparable to NdFeAs(O,F). Transmission electron microscopy investigation supported that hydrogen is homogenously substituted for oxygen. A high self-field $J_{\rm c}$ of over 10 MA/cm$^2$ was recorded at 5 K, which is likely to be caused by a short London penetration depth. The anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau scaling for the angle dependence of $J_{\rm c}$ yielded temperature-dependent scaling parameters $γ_{\rm J}$ that decreased from 1.6 at 30 K to 1.3 at 5 K. This is opposite to the behaviour of NdFeAs(O,F). Additionally, $γ_{\rm J}$ of NdFeAs(O,H) is smaller than that of NdFeAs(O,F). Our results indicate that heavily electron doping by means of hydrogen substitution for oxygen in $Ln$FeAsO is highly beneficial for achieving high $J_{\rm c}$ with low anisotropy without compromising $T_{\rm c}$, which is favourable for high-field magnet applications.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NdFeAs(O,H)

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers