The critical field and specific heat in the electron- and hole-doped graphene superconductors
Ewa A. Drzazga-Szczęśniak, Adam Z. Kaczmarek
arXiv:2208.07079 · DOI 10.12693/APhysPolA.143.148 · 2022-08-15 · Acta Physica Polonica A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Doping is one of the most prominent techniques to alter properties of a given material. Herein, the influence of the electron- and hole-doping on the selected superconducting properties of graphene are considered. In details, the Migdal-Eliashberg formalism is employed to analyze the specific heat and the critical magnetic field in the representative case of graphene doped with nitrogen or boron, respectively. It is found that the electron doping is much more favorable in terms of enhancing the aforementioned properties than its hole counterpart. These findings are appropriately summarized by the means of the dimensionless thermodynamic ratios, familiar in the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. To this end, the perspectives for future research on superconductivity in graphene are drawn.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 105.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 83.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CB Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 55.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CB Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 44.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CB Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Thermodynamics of the hydrogen dominant potassium hydride superconductor at high pressure
similarity 0.92D. Szczȩśniak & R. Szczȩśniak · 2015 · arXiv:1502.03017
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductive Sodalite-like Clathrate Hydrides MXH with Critical Temperatures of near 300 K under Pressures
similarity 0.91Yuxiang Fan et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.00234
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multigap superconductivity in lithium intercalated bilayer MoC
similarity 0.91Can Hong et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.13886
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Preempted phonon-mediated superconductivity in the infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.91Q. N. Meier et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.05486
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamics of the superconducting state in Calcium at 200 GPa
similarity 0.90R. Szczęśniak & A. P. Durajski · 2011 · arXiv:1108.1574
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupled system of electrons and exciton-polaritons: Screening, dynamical effects, and superconductivity
similarity 0.90Andrey S. Plyashechnik et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.11245
Source status unknown — claims are unverified