Closed-loop machine learning for discovery of novel superconductors
Elizabeth A. Pogue, Alexander New, Kyle McElroy, Nam Q. Le, Michael J. Pekala, Ian McCue, Eddie Gienger, Janna Domenico, Elizabeth Hedrick, Tyrel M. McQueen, Brandon Wilfong, Christine D. Piatko, Christopher R. Ratto, Andrew Lennon, Christine Chung, Timothy Montalbano, Gregory Bassen, Christopher D. Stiles
arXiv:2212.11855 · 2022-12-22
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The discovery of novel materials drives industrial innovation, although the pace of discovery tends to be slow due to the infrequency of "Eureka!" moments. These moments are typically tangential to the original target of the experimental work: "accidental discoveries". Here we demonstrate the acceleration of intentional materials discovery - targeting material properties of interest while generalizing the search to a large materials space with machine learning (ML) methods. We demonstrate a closed-loop ML discovery process targeting novel superconducting materials, which have industrial applications ranging from quantum computing to sensors to power delivery. By closing the loop, i.e. by experimentally testing the results of the ML-generated superconductivity predictions and feeding data back into the ML model to refine, we demonstrate that success rates for superconductor discovery can be more than doubled. In four closed-loop cycles, we discovered a new superconductor in the Zr-In-Ni system, re-discovered five superconductors unknown in the training datasets, and identified two additional phase diagrams of interest for new superconducting materials. Our work demonstrates the critical role experimental feedback provides in ML-driven discovery, and provides definite evidence that such technologies can accelerate discovery even in the absence of knowledge of the underlying physics.
Similar papers
Towards high-throughput superconductor discovery via machine learning
similarity 0.93Stephen R. Xie et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2104.11150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
AI-driven inverse design of materials: Past, present and future
similarity 0.92Xiao-Qi Han et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.09429
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Accelerating the Search for Superconductors Using Machine Learning
similarity 0.89Suhas Adiga & Umesh V. Waghmare · 2025 · arXiv:2505.11964
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diffusion Models for Conditional Generation of Hypothetical New Families of Superconductors
similarity 0.87Samuel Yuan & S. V. Dordevic · 2024 · arXiv:2402.00198
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of superconducting properties of materials based on machine learning models
similarity 0.87Jie Hu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.03075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large Language Models for Superconductor Discovery
similarity 0.87Suman Itani et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.10847
Source status unknown — claims are unverified