Effects of fabrication routes and material parameters on the control of superconducting currents by gate voltage
Ruf, Leon, Elalaily, Tosson, Puglia, Claudio, Ivanov, Yurii P., Joint, Francois, Berke, Martin, Iorio, Andrea, Makk, Peter, De Simoni, Giorgio, Gasparinetti, Simone, Divitini, Giorgio, Csonka, Szabolcs, Giazotto, Francesco, Scheer, Elke, Di Bernardo, Angelo
arXiv:2304.07084 · DOI 10.1063/5.0159750 · 2023-12-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The control of a superconducting current via the application of a gate voltage has been recently demonstrated in a variety of superconducting devices. Although the mechanism underlying this gate-controlled supercurrent (GCS) effect remains under debate, the GCS effect has raised great interest for the development of the superconducting equivalent of conventional metaloxide semiconductor electronics. To date, however, the GCS effect has been mostly observed in superconducting devices made by additive patterning. Here, we show that devices made by subtractive patterning show a systematic absence of the GCS effect. Doing a microstructural analysis of these devices and comparing them to devices made by additive patterning, where we observe a GCS, we identify some material and physical parameters that are crucial for the observation of a GCS. We also show that some of the mechanisms proposed to explain the origin of the GCS effect are not universally relevant.
Similar papers
Gate control of superconducting current: Mechanisms, parameters and technological potential
similarity 0.94Leon Ruf et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.13734
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate control of superconductivity in mesoscopic all-metallic devices
similarity 0.89Claudio Puglia et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.00215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The global critical current effect of superconductivity
similarity 0.87Heng Wu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.20896
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Giant Proximity Effect in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.86I. Bozovic et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Control of competing superconductivity and charge order by nonequilibrium currents
similarity 0.85Anne Matthies et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrostatic field-driven supercurrent suppression in ionic-gated metallic Josephson nanotransistors
similarity 0.85Federico Paolucci et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.00935
Source status unknown — claims are unverified