Extraction of the self energy and Eliashberg function from angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy using the \textsc{xARPES} code
Thomas P. van Waas, Christophe Berthod, Jan Berges, Nicola Marzari, J. Hugo Dil, Samuel Poncé
arXiv:2508.13845 · DOI 10.1038/s41524-026-02026-9 · 2025-08-19 · Npj Computational Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy is a powerful experimental technique for studying anisotropic many-body interactions through the electron spectral function. Existing attempts to decompose the spectral function into non-interacting dispersions and electron-phonon, electron-electron, and electron-impurity self-energies rely on linearization of the bands and manual assignment of self-energy magnitudes. Here, we show how self-energies can be extracted consistently for curved dispersions. We extend the maximum-entropy method to Eliashberg-function extraction with Bayesian inference, optimizing the parameters describing the dispersions and the magnitudes of electron-electron and electron-impurity interactions. We compare these novel methodologies with state-of-the-art approaches on model data, then demonstrate their applicability with two high-quality experimental data sets. With the first set, we identify the phonon modes of a two-dimensional electron liquid on TiO$_2$-terminated SrTiO$_3$. With the second set, we obtain unprecedented agreement between two Eliashberg functions of Li-doped graphene extracted from separate dispersions. We release these functionalities in the novel Python code \textsc{xARPES}.
Similar papers
Free energy and specific heat near a quantum critical point of a metal
similarity 0.88Shang-Shun Zhang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.01873
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nature of the Nodal Kink in Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectra of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.87H. S. Ruiz & A. Badía · 2008 · arXiv:0811.3863
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bounds on in the Eliashberg theory of Superconductivity. I: The -model
similarity 0.86Michael K. -H. Kiessling et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.00533
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Angle and frequency dependence of self-energy from spin fluctuations mediated d-wave pairing for high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.86Seung Hwan Hong & Han-Yong Choi · 2013 · arXiv:1303.7022
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fe-based superconductors: an angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy perspective
similarity 0.86P. Richard et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.6751
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic dressing of electrons in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.86Shuning Tan et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.06781
Source status unknown — claims are unverified