Hidden Universal Metal in Cuprate Superconductors
Abigail Lee, Juergen Haase
arXiv:2604.10133 · DOI 10.3390/condmat11030031 · 2026-07-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nuclear relaxation is a very robust probe of electronic excitations in superconducting materials, above and below the critical temperature of superconductivity, $T_\mathrm{c}$. Here, a phenomenology of it in cuprate superconductors is established based on essentially all cuprate data available in the literature from the CuO$_2$ plane. A universal 'hidden metal' with $1/T_1 T = const$ reigns below the pseudogap line, and, similar to usual superconducting metals, all cuprates condense at $T_\mathrm{c}$ out of this metal and relaxation ceases rapidly. There is no Hebel-Slichter peak. Above the hidden metal, a renormalized two-component metal is found. Therefore, the hidden metal is identified as the pseudogap matter, which has other important properties. It predominantly lacks a uniform response, unlike the normal metal above $T^*$, and it does not significantly relax planar O. However, for planar Cu it exhibits a special relaxation anisotropy. With the field in the plane, it causes a relaxation rate that is very similar for all cuprates, $1/{^{63}T}_{1\perp}T\approx 25/$Ks, while with the field parallel to the $c$-axis, $1/{^{63}T}_{1\parallel}T$, the proportional rate (in the pseudogap range) changes as a function of doping and material. This relaxation anisotropy is strictly correlated with the maximum critical temperature, $T_\mathrm{c,max}$, of all cuprates. It is stipulated that two partially independent spin components are needed to understand this behavior. The new phenomenology will be discussed and should give a better foundation for the understanding of the cuprates
Similar papers
Temperature independent cuprate pseudogap from planar oxygen NMR
similarity 0.88Jakob Nachtigal et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2009.09492
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenology of Cu nuclear relaxation in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88Michael Jurkutat et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.10625
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NMR shift and relaxation and the electronic spin of superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.88Marija Avramovska et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.09903
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and Condensation in Cuprate Superconductors from NMR Shifts
similarity 0.88Abigail Lee & Juergen Haase · 2026 · arXiv:2604.19215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Systematic (63)Cu NQR and (89)Y NMR Study of Spin Dynamics in Y(1-z)Ca(z)Ba(2)Cu(3)O(y) Across Superconductor-Insulator Boundary
similarity 0.88P. M. Singer & T. Imai · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0112234
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Carrier concentration independent antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations in the electron-doped high-temperature superconducting cuprate Pr2−xCexCuO4
similarity 0.88G. V. M. Williams et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified