Understanding the superconducting proximity effect in semiconductors through quantum oscillations
Milo Coombs, Teun A. J. van Schijndel, Yu Wu, Jason T. Dong, Yilmaz Gul, Julian Choi, Christopher J. Palmstrøm, Greg P. Mazur
arXiv:2609.01593 · 2026-09-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductor-semiconductor hybrids host emergent states of matter and offer a platform for new qubits, but the superconducting metal shunts electrical transport, which rules out conventional semiconductor characterization and leaves the hybrid parameters to speculation. Here we determine density, mass, $g$-factor, mobility and subband occupation beneath the superconductor, from Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations of a buried InAs quantum well under Al, Sn, V, Nb, Ta and Re films, with a Dingle analysis that accounts for the shunt. Every metal adds an interface subband whose occupation falls into one of two classes, whereas the mass and $g$-factor of the buried well are unchanged to within 10\%. Within the uncertainty set by the transport mobility, no film shortens the quantum lifetime of the buried well, and Al and Sn lengthen it. Quantum lifetimes bound the hybridization of the interface subband to 2-4~meV. These measurements supply the normal-state parameters that tunnelling spectroscopy renormalizes but cannot measure.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Metallization of Rashba wire by superconducting layer in the strong-proximity regime
similarity 0.86Christopher Reeg et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.06509
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between pairing and correlations in spin-polarized bound states
similarity 0.86S. Glodzik et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1712.03172
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous proximity effects at the interface of s and s+- superconductors
similarity 0.86Valentin G. Stanev & Alexei E. Koshelev · 2012 · arXiv:1207.5565
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detecting induced pairing at the Al-InAs interface with a quantum microwave circuit
similarity 0.86D. Phan et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.03695
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate defined wires in HgTe quantum wells: from Majorana fermions to spintronics
similarity 0.86Johannes Reuther et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.1207
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hot-lines topology and the fate of the spin resonance mode in three-dimensional unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.86Fei Chen et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.12434
Source status unknown — claims are unverified