Interface superconductivity in the eutectic Sr2RuO4-Ru: 3-K phase of Sr2RuO4
Hiroshi Yaguchi, Masahiko Wada, Takashi Akima, Yoshiteru Maeno, Takehiko Ishiguro
arXiv:cond-mat/0305063 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.214519 · 2003-05-04 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The eutectic system Sr2RuO4-Ru is referred to as the 3-K phase of the spin-triplet supeconductor Sr2RuO4 because of its enhanced superconducting transition temperature Tc of ~3 K. We have investigated the field-temperature (H-T) phase diagram of the 3-K phase for fields parallel and perpendicular to the ab-plane of Sr2RuO4, using out-of-plane resistivity measurements. We have found an upturn curvature in the Hc2(T) curve for H // c, and a rather gradual temperature dependence of Hc2 close to Tc for both H // ab and H // c. We have also investigated the dependence of Hc2 on the angle between the field and the ab-plane at several temperatures. Fitting the Ginzburg-Landau effective-mass model apparently fails to reproduce the angle dependence, particularly near H // c and at low temperatures. We propose that all of these charecteric features can be explained, at least in a qualitative fashion, on the basis of a theory by Sigrist and Monien that assumes surface superconductivity with a two-component order parameter occurring at the interface between Sr2RuO4 and Ru inclusions. This provides evidence of the chiral state postulated for the 1.5-K phase by several experiments.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Superconducting gap symmetry from Bogoliubov quasiparticle interference analysis on {Sr}{RuO}
similarity 0.93Shinibali Bhattacharyya et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.10712
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-orbit Coupling and Multiple Phases in Spin-triplet Superconductor SrRuO
similarity 0.93Youichi Yanase et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1408.6353
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct reduction of Knight shift in superconducting state of SrRuO under uniaxial strain
similarity 0.92Austin W. Lindquist & Hae-Young Kee · 2019 · arXiv:1912.02215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exotic Cooper pairing in multi-orbital models of SrRuO
similarity 0.92Wen Huang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.03523
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic Evidence for a Two-Component Superconducting Order Parameter in SrRuO
similarity 0.91Sayak Ghosh et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.06130
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interface superconductivity in the eutectic Sr2RuO4−Ru: 3-K phase of Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.91Hiroshi Yaguchi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified