Crossover from Kramers to phase-diffusion switching in hysteretic DC-SQUIDs
J. Mannik, S. Li, W. Qiu, W. Chen, V. Patel, S. Han, J. E. Lukens
arXiv:cond-mat/0503729 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.220509 · 2005-03-31 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have measured and propose a model for switching rates in hysteretic DC-SQUID in the regime where phase diffusion processes start to occur. We show that the switching rates in this regime are smaller than the rates given by Kramers' formula due to retrapping of Josephson phase. The retrapping process, which is affected by the frequency dependent impedance of the environment of the DC-SQUID, leads to a peaked second moment of the switching distribution as a function of temperature. The temperature where the peaks occur are proportional to the critical current of the DC- SQUID.
Similar papers
Crossover from Kramers to phase-diffusion switching in moderately damped Josephson junctions
similarity 0.93J. Männik et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of two-dimensional macroscopic quantum tunneling of a current-biased DC-SQUID
similarity 0.87F. Balestro et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0308559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux Dependent Crossover Between Quantum and Classical Behavior in a dc-SQUID
similarity 0.87Susanne Butz et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1404.3602
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Onset of phase diffusion in high kinetic inductance granular aluminum micro-SQUIDs
similarity 0.87Felix Friedrich et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.11067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of transition from escape dynamics to underdamped phase diffusion in a Josephson junction
similarity 0.87J. M. Kivioja et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0501383
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diode effects in current-biased Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87Jacob F. Steiner et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.06866
Source status unknown — claims are unverified