Phase formation and superconductivity of Fe-tube encapsulated and vacuum annealed MgB2
K. P. Singh, V. P. S. Awana, Md. Shahabuddin, R. B. Saxena, Rashmi Nigam, M. A. Ansari, Anurag Gupta, Himanshu Narayan, S. K. Halder, H. Kishan
arXiv:cond-mat/0601112 · DOI 10.1142/S0217984906011840 · 2006-01-06 · Modern Physics Letters B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report optimization of the synthesis parameters viz. heating temperature (TH), and hold time (thold) for vacuum (10-5 torr) annealed and LN2 (liquid nitrogen) quenched MgB2 compound. These are single-phase compounds crystallizing in the hexagonal structure (space group P6/mmm) at room temperature. Our XRD results indicated that for phase-pure MgB2, the TH for 10-5 torr annealed and LN2 quenched samples is 750 0C. The right stoichiometry i.e., MgB2 of the compound corresponding to 10-5 Torr and TH of 750 0C is found for the hold time (thold) of 2.30 hours. With varying thold from 1- 4 hours at fixed TH (750 0C) and vacuum (10-5 torr), the c-lattice parameter decreases first and later increases with thold (hours) before a near saturation, while the a-lattice parameter first increase and later decreases beyond thold of 2.30 hours. c/a ratio versus thold plot showed an inverted bell shape curve, touching the lowest value of 1.141 which is reported value for perfect stoichiometry of MgB2. The optimized stoichimetric MgB2 compound exhibited superconductivity at 39.2 K with transition width of 0.6 K. In conclusion, the synthesis parameters for phase pure stoichimetric vacuum annealed MgB2 compound are optimized and are compared with widely reported Ta tube encapsulated samples.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Influence of Preparation Process on Microstructure, Critical Current Density and Tc of MgB2/Fe/Cu Wires
similarity 0.87Y. F. Wu et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hydrostatic Pressure Effect on the Superconducting Transition Temperature of MgB2
similarity 0.87B. Lorenz et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104303
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-energy ball milling and synthesi temperature study to improve superconducting properties of MgB2 ex-situ tapes and wires
similarity 0.86Gennaro Romano et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.2438
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Influence of Synthesis Parameters on Microstructures and Superconducting Properties of MgB2 Bulks
similarity 0.86Y. F. Wu et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0603536
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of pressure on the superconducting transition temperature of doped and neutron-damaged MgB2
similarity 0.86S. L. Bud'ko et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411149
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Preparation and Superconductivity of a MgB2 Superconducting Tape
similarity 0.86G. C. Che et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified