A Numerical Treatment of the Rf SQUID: I. General Properties and Noise Energy
Reinhold Kleiner, Dieter Koelle, John Clarke
arXiv:cond-mat/0701718 · DOI 10.1007/s10909-007-9511-x · 2007-01-29 · Journal of Low Temperature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the characteristics and noise performance of rf Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs) by solving the corresponding Langevin equations numerically and optimizing the model parameters with respect to noise energy. After introducing the basic concepts of the numerical simulations, we give a detailed discussion of the performance of the SQUID as a function of all relevant parameters. The best performance is obtained in the crossover region between the dispersive and dissipative regimes, characterized by an inductance parameter β_L'\equiv 2πL I_0/Φ_0\approx 1; L is the loop inductance, I_0 the critical current of the Josephson junction, and Φ_0 the flux quantum. In this regime, which is not well explored by previous analytical approaches, the lowest (intrinsic) values of noise energy are a factor of about 2 above previous estimates based on analytical approaches. However, several other analytical predictions, such as the inverse proportionality of the noise energy on the tank circuit quality factor and the square of the coupling coefficient between the tank circuit and the SQUID loop, could not be well reproduced. The optimized intrinsic noise energy of the rf SQUID is superior to that of the dc SQUID at all temperatures. Although for technologically achievable parameters this advantage shrinks, particularly at low thermal fluctuation levels, we give an example for realistic parameters that leads to a noise energy comparable to that of the dc SQUID even in this regime.
Similar papers
Impedance of radio-frequency-biased resistive superconducting quantum interference devices
similarity 0.90R. J. Soulen, Jr. & Deborah Van Vechten
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hybrid rf SQUID qubit based on high kinetic inductance
similarity 0.89J. T. Peltonen et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.09720
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise Performance of Lumped Element Direct Current Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Amplifiers in the 4 GHz-8 GHz Range
similarity 0.88Lafe Spietz et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.4673
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting microwave resonators with non-centrosymmetric nonlinearity
similarity 0.88M. Khabipov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.10133
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Geometrical dependence of low frequency noise in superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.88T. Lanting et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.0378
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of resonances on the noise performance of SQUID susceptometers
similarity 0.88Samantha I Davis et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.03836
Source status unknown — claims are unverified