Comment on "T-dependence of the magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors at low temperatures: Can it be linear?"
G. E. Volovik
arXiv:cond-mat/9805159 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4023 · 1998-05-13 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We show that the clean superconductor with line of gap nodes is not in conflict with the Nernst theorem. The answer to the question in the title of the Schopohl-Dolgov paper in Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4761 (cond-mat/9802264) is yes.
Similar papers
Comment on ``-dependence of the magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors at low temperatures: Can it be linear?"
similarity 0.89P. J. Hirschfeld et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “ T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors at Low Temperatures: Can It Be Linear?”
similarity 0.88G. E. Volovik
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “ T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors at Low Temperatures: Can It Be Linear?”
similarity 0.88P. J. Hirschfeld et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the T-dependence of the magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors at low temperatures: can it be linear?
similarity 0.88N. Schopohl & O. V. Dolgov · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9802264
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to Comments "T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors..."
similarity 0.88N. Schopohl & O. V. Dolgov · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806233
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range thermoelectric effects in mesoscopic superconductor-normal metal structures
similarity 0.86A. F. Volkov & V. V. Pavlovskii · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0505164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified