Reply to Comments "T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors..."
N. Schopohl, O. V. Dolgov
arXiv:cond-mat/9806233 · 1998-06-19 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).
Similar papers
On the T-dependence of the magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors at low temperatures: can it be linear?
similarity 0.88N. Schopohl & O. V. Dolgov · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9802264
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “ T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors at Low Temperatures: Can It Be Linear?”
similarity 0.88G. E. Volovik
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “ T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors at Low Temperatures: Can It Be Linear?”
similarity 0.88P. J. Hirschfeld et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on "T-dependence of the magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors at low temperatures: Can it be linear?"
similarity 0.87G. E. Volovik · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9805159
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ``-dependence of the magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors at low temperatures: Can it be linear?"
similarity 0.86P. J. Hirschfeld et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic Insights into London Penetration Depth: Application to CeCoIn
similarity 0.85Mehdi Biderang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.00499
Source status unknown — claims are unverified