Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Double resistive superconducting transition in Sm2−xCexCuO4−y’ ’’
E. A. Early, R. F. Jardim, C. C. Almasan, M. B. Maple
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.8650 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We point out that a comprehensive study of granular electron-doped superconductors should include more than electrical resistivity and magnetoresistance measurements. Features of polycrystalline samples such as superconducting fraction and superconducting grain size are important variables in systems close to both metal-insulator and superconductor-insulator transitions. In particular, for samples where superconductivity is confined to small regions, charging effects should be considered.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sm2-xCexCuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Eu1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Determination of the upper critical field of the electron-doped superconductor Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y from resistive fluctuations
similarity 0.94S. H. Han et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ‘‘Double resistive superconducting transition in Sm2−xCexCuO4−y’’
similarity 0.94T. Grenet et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double resistive superconducting transition in Sm2−xCexCuO4−y
similarity 0.91E. A. Early et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-fluid model for transport properties of granular superconductors
similarity 0.91C. A. M. dos Santos et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double-step resistive superconducting transitions of indium and gallium in porous glass
similarity 0.91C. Tien et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Damping of the vortex motion in the electron-doped superconductor Nd1.85Ce0.15CuOx
similarity 0.90R. P. Huebener & F. Gollnik
Source status unknown — claims are unverified