Comment on ‘‘Double resistive superconducting transition in Sm2−xCexCuO4−y’’
T. Grenet, A. Gerber, M. Cyrot
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.8647 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, E. A. Early et al. [Phys. Rev. B 47, 433 (1993)] presented resistivity measurements on Sm2−xCexCuO4−y polycrystalline samples exhibiting double-step resistive superconducting transitions, and drew general conclusions about the behavior of granular electron-doped compounds. We point out that the behavior observed in this family of compounds is very sample dependent, and that many different and richer cases of this can be found, the one described by the authors being merely a particular example. We also discuss unusual signatures of the beginning of superconducting transitions in inhomogeneous samples.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO3.97 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sm2-xCexCuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pseudogap in electron-doped superconducting Sm2−xCexCuO4−δ by interlayer magnetotransport
similarity 0.93Tsuyoshi Kawakami et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and thermoelectric power of Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y
similarity 0.92Sung-Ik Lee et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double-step resistive superconducting transitions of indium and gallium in porous glass
similarity 0.92C. Tien et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double resistive superconducting transition in Sm2−xCexCuO4−y
similarity 0.91E. A. Early et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Double resistive superconducting transition in Sm2−xCexCuO4−y’ ’’
similarity 0.91E. A. Early et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interaction between two structural blocks and superconductivity in La2−xMxCuO4(M=Ba,Sr)
similarity 0.89S. X. Wang & H. Zhang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified