Crossing point of the magnetization versus temperature curves and the Meissner fraction in granular La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 superconductors: Random orientation and inhomogeneity effects
J. Mosqueira, M. V. Ramallo, A. Revcolevschi, C. Torrón, Félix Vidal
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.4394 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this paper, we first calculate the extrinsic random orientation effects on the Meissner fraction in granular layered superconductors with highly anisotropic single crystal grains. Then we present detailed measurements of the crossing point of the excess magnetization versus temperature curves, ΔM(T)H, in the reversible mixed state and of the Meissner fraction in two granular La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 samples, before and after grain alignment. The analyses of these experiments on the grounds of the calculations indicated above allow us to disentangle the different extrinsic effects on the excess magnetization at the crossing point, ΔM*, and on the field-cooled susceptibility at the crossing point temperature, χFC(T*): random orientation, demagnetization, and inhomogeneities. We show then that once these two measured observables are adequately and separately corrected from random orientation and demagnetizing effects, the remaining extrinsic effects on ΔM* (associated with structural and, mainly, stoichiometric inhomogeneities) may be taken into account through χFC(T*). This seems to apply at least in samples with relatively good magnetic response [let us say, with |χabFC(T*)|≳0.2]. The resulting intrinsic crossing point may be explained in terms of the theoretical approaches proposed by Bulaevskii and co-workers and by Tes̆anović and co-workers and based on thermal fluctuations of vortices. These last results extend to granular high-temperature superconductors (HTSC) our recent conclusions for highly anisotropic single crystalline HTSC.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Reversible magnetization and superconducting-state thermodynamic parameters for underdoped La1.90Sr0.10CuO4
similarity 0.93Yung M. Huh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Linear temperature dependence of the resistivity in the new superconductors
similarity 0.92L. Civale & E. N. Martinez
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic properties and electronic conduction of superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.92T. Nakano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Importance of structural instability to high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.92A. Bussmann-Holder et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microstructure and the superconductivity in La2−x−ySrxNayCuO4 systems
similarity 0.92Changjin Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical Experimental Evidence for a Universal Length Scale for the Dynamic Charge Inhomogeneity of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.92D. Mihailovic
Source status unknown — claims are unverified