Ultra-sensitive SQUID instrumentation for MEG and NCI by ULF MRI
Rainer Körber
arXiv:1903.09401 · DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_199 · 2019-03-22 · arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The requirements for the construction of ultra-sensitive SQUID instrumentation as used in biomagnetism are presented. Typically, SQUIDs are inductively coupled to pick-up coils and for this arrangement one can improve the noise performance by increasing the sensing coil area. To achieve optimum sensitivity one has to consider the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which is an intricate interplay between source characteristics and noise origin. It turns out that separate pick-up coil designs are needed for various noise characteristics even for an identical source. Hence, a hybrid system with differently sized pick-up coils presents the best option for multipurpose applications. A single channel system with close to SQUID intrinsic noise level is also described. This is possible by utilizing a special dewar design and thereby enabling a further increase in SNR. Such a system might be used for current density imaging and neuronal current imaging by ultra-low-field magnetic resonance where it also must be able to be field-tolerant to up to 100-200 mT.
Similar papers
A modular, extendible and field-tolerant multichannel vector magnetometer based on current sensor SQUIDs
similarity 0.88Jan-Hendrik Storm et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.08382
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SQUID current sensors with an integrated thermally actuated input current limiter
similarity 0.88Rainer Körber et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.13821
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The role of kinetic inductance on the performance of YBCO SQUID magnetometers
similarity 0.88Ruffieux, S. et al. · 2020 · arXiv:1910.03991
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Application of superconducting quantum interference devices to nuclear magnetic resonance
similarity 0.87Ya. S. Greenberg
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junctions, superconducting circuits, and qubit for quantum technologies
similarity 0.87Roberta Citro et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.20911
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting receiver arrays for magnetic resonance imaging
similarity 0.87Koos C. J. Zevenhoven et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.08867
Source status unknown — claims are unverified