Charge density wave and superconductivity in the family of telluride chalcogenides Zn1-xCuxIr2-yN(N = Al, Ti, Rh)yTe4
Dong Yan, Yijie Zeng, Yishi Lin, Lingyong Zeng, Junjie Yin, Yuan He, Mebrouka Boubeche, Meng Wang, Yihua Wang, Dao-Xin Yao, Huixia Luo
arXiv:2003.11463 · 2020-03-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The interplay between superconductivity and charge density wave (CDW)/metal-to-insulator transition (MIT) has long been interested and studied in condensed matter physics. Here we study systematically the charge density wave and superconductivity properties in the solid solutions Zn1-xCuxIr2-yN(N = Al, Ti, Rh)yTe4. Resistivity, magnetic susceptibility and specific heat measurements indicate that the CDW state was suppressed immediately while the superconducting critical temperature (Tc) differs from each system. In the Al- and Ti-substitution cases, Tc increase as y increases and reaches a maximum around 2.75 K and 2.84 K respectively at y = 0.075, followed by a decrease of Tc before the chemical phase boundary is reached at y = 0.2. Nevertheless, Tc decreases monotonously with Rh-doping content y increases and disappears above 0.3 with measuring temperature down to 2 K. Surprisingly, in the Zn1-xCuxIr2Te4 solid solution, Tc enhances as x increases and reaches a maximum value of 2.82 K for x = 0.5 but subsequently survives over the whole doping range of 0.00 - 0.9 despite Tc changes slightly with higher doping content, which differs from the observation of zinc doping suppressing the superconductivity quickly in the high Tc cuprate superconductors. The specific heat anomaly at the superconducting transitions for the representative optimal doping samples are all slightly higher than the BCS value of 1.43 and indicate bulk superconductivity in these compounds. Finally, the CDW transition temperature (TCDW) and superconducting transition temperature (Tc) vs. x/y content phase diagrams of Zn1-xCuxIr2-yN(N = Al, Ti, Rh)yTe4 have been established and compared, which offers good opportunity to study the competition between CDW and superconductivity in the telluride chalcogenides.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zn1-xCuxIr1.925Al0.075Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Zn1-xCuxIr1.925Ti0.075Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.84 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Zn0.5Cu0.5Ir2Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.82 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in CuIr2-xAlxTe4 telluride chalcogenides
similarity 0.93Dong Yan et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.11615
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between Charge-Density-Wave, Superconductivity, and Ferromagnetism in CuIr2-xCrxTe4 Chalcogenides
similarity 0.90Lingyong Zeng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.04599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Charge Density Wave of CuIr2Te4 by Iodine Doping
similarity 0.90Mebrouka Boubeche et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.03473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Ru-doped CuIr2Te4 telluride chalcogenide
similarity 0.90Dong Yan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the Ru-Doped CuIr2Te4 Telluride Chalcogenide
similarity 0.89Dong Yan et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.09292
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of superconductivity and charge density wave ordering in pseudoternary alloy compounds: Lu2Ir3(Si1−xGex)5, Lu2(Ir1−xRhx)3Si5, and (Lu1−xScx)2Ir3Si5
similarity 0.89N. S. Sangeetha et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified