A Review of X-ray Microcalorimeters Based on Superconducting Transition Edge Sensors for Astrophysics and Particle Physics
Luciano Gottardi, Kenichiro Nagayoshi
arXiv:2210.06914 · DOI 10.3390/app11093793 · 2022-10-13 · Applied Sciences
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The state-of-the-art technology of X-ray microcalorimeters based on superconducting transition edge sensors (TESs), for applications in astrophysics and particle physics, is reviewed. We will show the advance in understanding the detector physics and describe the recent breakthroughs in the TES design that are opening the way towards the fabrication and the read-out of very large arrays of pixels with unprecedented energy resolution. The most challenging low temperature instruments for space- and ground-base experiments will be described.
Similar papers
Full-scale Microwave SQUID Multiplexer Readout System for Magnetic Microcalorimeters
similarity 0.89M. Neidig et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.07671
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity Effects and Nonequilibrium Superconductivity in Transition-Edge Sensors
similarity 0.88John E. Sadleir et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.4632
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Normal metal - superconductor decoupling as a source of thermal fluctuation noise in transition-edge sensors
similarity 0.87K. M. Kinnunen et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1111.4098
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
GHz Superconducting Single-Photon Detectors for Dark Matter Search
similarity 0.87Federico Paolucci & Francesco Giazotto · 2021 · arXiv:2101.08558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effects in an alternating current biased transition edge sensor
similarity 0.87Luciano Gottardi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1604.00549
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Simulation framework for microwave SQUID multiplexer optimization
similarity 0.87Constantin Schuster et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.02013
Source status unknown — claims are unverified