Proximity Effects and Nonequilibrium Superconductivity in Transition-Edge Sensors
John E. Sadleir, Stephen J. Smith, Ian K. Robinson, Fred M. Finkbeiner, James A. Chervenak, Simon R. Bandler, Megan E. Eckart, Caroline A. Kilbourne
arXiv:1108.4632 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.184502 · 2011-08-23 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have recently shown that normal-metal/superconductor (N/S) bilayer TESs (superconducting Transition-Edge Sensors) exhibit weak-link behavior.1 Here we extend our understanding to include TESs with added noise-mitigating normal-metal structures (N structures). We find TESs with added Au structures also exhibit weak-link behavior as evidenced by exponential temperature dependence of the critical current and Josephson-like oscillations of the critical current with applied magnetic field. We explain our results in terms of an effect converse to the longitudinal proximity effect (LoPE)1, the lateral inverse proximity effect (LaiPE), for which the order parameter in the N/S bilayer is reduced due to the neighboring N structures. Resistance and critical current measurements are presented as a function of temperature and magnetic field taken on square Mo/Au bilayer TESs with lengths ranging from 8 to 130 μm with and without added N structures. We observe the inverse proximity effect on the bilayer over in-plane distances many tens of microns and find the transition shifts to lower temperatures scale approximately as the inverse square of the in- plane N-structure separation distance, without appreciable broadening of the transition width. We also present evidence for nonequilbrium superconductivity and estimate a quasiparticle lifetime of 1.8 \times 10-10 s for the bilayer. The LoPE model is also used to explain the increased conductivity at temperatures above the bilayer's steep resistive transition.
Similar papers
Proximity effects and nonequilibrium superconductivity in transition-edge sensors
similarity 0.90John E. Sadleir et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous proximity effect in mesoscopic normal-metal–superconductor structures
similarity 0.88V. N. Antonov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging the Superconducting Proximity Effect in S-S'-S Transition Edge Sensors
similarity 0.87Austin R. Kaczmarek et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.19399
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity DC squids in the long junction limit
similarity 0.87L. Angers et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0708.0205
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unusual boundary effect on coherency of two-band superconductivity
similarity 0.87Artjom Vargunin et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1610.04166
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Review of X-ray Microcalorimeters Based on Superconducting Transition Edge Sensors for Astrophysics and Particle Physics
similarity 0.87Luciano Gottardi & Kenichiro Nagayoshi · 2022 · arXiv:2210.06914
Source status unknown — claims are unverified