Imaging the Superconducting Proximity Effect in S-S'-S Transition Edge Sensors
Austin R. Kaczmarek, Samantha Walker, Jason Austermann, Douglas Bennett, W. Bertrand Doriese, Shannon M. Duff, Johannes Hubmayr, Kelsey Morgan, Michael D. Niemack, Dan Schmidt, Daniel Swetz, Joel Ullom, Joel Weber, Katja C. Nowack
arXiv:2602.19399 · 2026-02-23
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Proximity effects at superconducting interfaces, between different superconductors (S-S') or between superconductors and normal metals (S-N), are fundamental to the performance of superconducting electronics, yet only few experiments have directly probed the spatial structure of proximity effects within a device. This is particularly relevant for transition edge sensors (TESs), where the interplay of direct and inverse proximity effects governs detector sensitivity. Here, we use scanning superconducting interference device (SQUID) susceptometry to directly image the local diamagnetic response in functional S-S'-S TES structures. We resolve long range proximity coupling extending over tens of micrometers, revealing that the local transition temperature is dramatically tuned by neighboring regions, being either enhanced by superconducting (S) leads or suppressed by normal metal (N) contacts. Our observations are quantitatively supported by Ginzburg Landau modeling of the device geometry and calculations of the temperature dependent diamagnetism based on self-consistent Usadel equations. By providing spatially resolved measurements of the interplay of proximity effects in TES devices, this work establishes a framework for understanding and controlling superconducting states in heterogeneous superconducting structures.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| AlMn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 174.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Longitudinal Proximity Effects in Superconducting Transition-Edge Sensors
similarity 0.90John E. Sadleir et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.2451
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd Triplet Superconductivity and Related Phenomena in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Structures
similarity 0.88F. S. Bergeret et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0506047
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity Effects and Nonequilibrium Superconductivity in Transition-Edge Sensors
similarity 0.88John E. Sadleir et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.4632
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thouless energy in Josephson SN-N-NS bridges
similarity 0.88S. V. Bakurskiy et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.01717
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct Imaging of Transition-Edge Sensors with Scanning SQUID Microscopy
similarity 0.88Samantha Walker et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.01940
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Review of X-ray Microcalorimeters Based on Superconducting Transition Edge Sensors for Astrophysics and Particle Physics
similarity 0.87Luciano Gottardi & Kenichiro Nagayoshi · 2022 · arXiv:2210.06914
Source status unknown — claims are unverified