← Back to search

Comparative Study of Dense Bulk MgB$_2$ Materials Prepared by Different Methods

V. N. Narozhnyi, G. Fuchs, A. Handstein, A. Gümbel, J. Eckert, K. Nenkov, D. Hinz, O. Gutfleisch, A. Wälte, L. N. Bogacheva, I. E. Kostyleva, K. -H. Müller, L. Schultz

arXiv:cond-mat/0206513 · DOI 10.1023/A:1021211628080 · 2002-06-26 · Journal of Superconductivity

T1experimental10 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report on the results of a comparative investigation of highly dense bulk MgB$_2$ samples prepared by three methods: (i) hot deformation; (ii) high pressure sintering; and (iii) mechanical alloying of Mg and B powders with subsequent hot compaction. All types of samples were studied by ac-susceptibility, dc-magnetization and resistivity measurements in magnetic fields up to $μ_0H=160$ kOe. A small but distinct anisotropy of the upper critical field $H_{c2}^{a,b}/H_{c2}^{c}\sim1.2$ connected with some texture of MgB$_2$ grains was found for the hot deformed samples. The samples prepared by high pressure sintering as well as by mechanical alloying show improved superconducting properties, including high upper critical fields $H_{c2}$ ($μ_0H_{c2}(0)\sim23$ T), irreversibility fields $H_{irr}$ which are strongly shifted towards higher values $H_{irr}(T)\sim0.8H_{c2}(T)$ and high critical current $J_c$ ($J_c=10^5$ A/cm$^2$ at 20 K and 1 T).

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers