← Back to search

Iron-chalcogenide FeSe$_{0.5}$Te$_{0.5}$ coated superconducting tapes for high field applications

Weidong Si, Juan Zhou, Qing Jie, Ivo Dimitrov, V. Solovyov, P. D. Johnson, J. Jaroszynski, V. Matias, C. Sheehan, Qiang Li

arXiv:1106.2466 · DOI 10.1063/1.3606557 · 2011-06-13 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T1theoretical103 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The high upper critical field characteristic of the recently discovered iron-based superconducting chalcogenides opens the possibility of developing a new type of non-oxide high-field superconducting wires. In this work, we utilize a buffered metal template on which we grow a textured FeSe$_{0.5}$Te$_{0.5}$ layer, an approach developed originally for high temperature superconducting coated conductors. These tapes carry high critical current densities (>1$\times10^{4}$A/cm$^{2}$) at about 4.2K under magnetic field as high as 25 T, which are nearly isotropic to the field direction. This demonstrates a very promising future for iron chalcogenides for high field applications at liquid helium temperatures. Flux pinning force analysis indicates a point defect pinning mechanism, creating prospects for a straightforward approach to conductor optimization.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
FeSe0.5Te0.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

11Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
FeSe0.5Te0.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
FeSe0.5Te0.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

14Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers