Constraints on a split superconducting transition under uniaxial strain in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ from scanning SQUID microscopy
Mueller, Eli, Iguchi, Yusuke, Watson, Christopher, Hicks, Clifford, Maeno, Yoshiteru, Moler, Kathryn
arXiv:2306.13737 · 2023-06-27
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
More than two decades after the discovery of superconductivity in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, it is still unclear whether the order parameter has a single component or two degenerate components. For any two-component scenario, application of uniaxial strain is expected to lift the degeneracy, generating two distinct phase transitions. The presence of a second (lower-temperature) transition may be observable by probes that are sensitive to changes in the London penetration depth, $λ$, as a function of temperature, $T$. Here, we use scanning SQUID microscopy combined with a uniaxial strain device to test for a second transition under strain. We only observe a single transition. Within the temperature range where a second transition has been suggested by $μ$SR measurements, we further place a tight upper bound of less than 1% on the change in the zero temperature superfluid density $n_s\proptoλ^{-2}(0)$ due to a second transition, suggesting that such a transition does not occur. These results constrain theories of the order parameter in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Constraints on a split superconducting transition under uniaxial strain in Sr2RuO4 from scanning SQUID microscopy
similarity 0.91Eli Mueller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting order parameter of SrRuO: a microscopic perspective
similarity 0.91Aline Ramires & Manfred Sigrist · 2019 · arXiv:1905.01288
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Heat capacity double transitions in time-reversal symmetry broken superconductors
similarity 0.90Henrik S. Røising et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.03896
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of Strain-Induced Magnetic Order and Splitting of and in SrRuO
similarity 0.90Astrid T. Rømer et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.13340
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unsplit superconducting and time reversal symmetry breaking transitions in SrRuO under hydrostatic pressure and disorder
similarity 0.90Vadim Grinenko et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.03600
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic Evidence for a Two-Component Superconducting Order Parameter in SrRuO
similarity 0.90Sayak Ghosh et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.06130
Source status unknown — claims are unverified